Seeing clearly: sourced texts to distinguish what is convincing from what is true.
I love debates. But I have often seen that a debate goes nowhere as long as no one has solid evidence, or lived experience of the subject. On social media, many people offer as proof a scientific article they once came across. Science remains valuable for answering a question, and I like to complement it with deeper philosophical reflection, informed by current events, that confirms or refutes an idea.
And sometimes I have felt at a loss when faced with an unfamiliar question, or I remembered a few facts without being able to cite their source. That is what struck me. I told myself I had to be able to tell true from false, so that I would stop being taken in and could hold a debate that gets to the bottom of things.
As I dig, I realize that often I do not know. We carry preconceptions that come from our parents, our background, or the people we meet, and we know very little about a subject before we have really plunged into it. When I look harder at a question, a whole universe unfolds beneath my feet: it is not all black or all white, it is gray, and some things I was always taught are false. That forces me to question the knowledge I thought I was born with.
I write for anyone who asks the questions I have asked myself, and who wants to go further than a sterile debate with someone who stays locked in their beliefs. I write for all the people who want to take the time to dig for themselves, to go and find the sources and read the scientific studies, and who have the honesty to question what they know, or what they think they know.